UnKnownAngel
Leading Contributor
When is he going to be available? I'd love an arcamon who has his own shinsu!
WhiteFoxman
- Thread starter UnKnownAngel
- Start date
The issue you have is, when WhiteFoxman becomes a pet - i.e. WhiteFoxman(Warda). When it summons a Shinsu, it becomes Shinsu(WhiteFoxman) which turns the Shinsu into a hostile monster (thinking it's allegiance is to the WhiteFoxman, and not the player, since you can't have Shinsu(WhiteFoxman(Warda)) ). The AI messes up and the WhiteFoxman thinks it doesn't have a pet and will keep summoning a Shinsu. For this to work, it would need to be completely reworked and, then you're stepping on taoists' feet with the Shinsu (or a second Shinsu?).
Unless we change it in other ways maybe?
Unless we change it in other ways maybe?
UnKnownAngel
Leading Contributor
Haha fair one! That would be dramatic wouldn't it, I like the Foxmen and potentially the WhiteFoxman could be reworked under your expertise and since it was left out for a reason, maybe it could be added in as a super rare arcamon and requires the Dragon stone to evolve.
- - - Updated - - -
What about using the upgrade system to create him, i.e Redfoxman + Yellowfoxman = WhiteFox then either level him to a certain point where he evolves into WhiteFoxman, or use Dragonstone. I'm sure he would be worth it.
- - - Updated - - -
What about using the upgrade system to create him, i.e Redfoxman + Yellowfoxman = WhiteFox then either level him to a certain point where he evolves into WhiteFoxman, or use Dragonstone. I'm sure he would be worth it.
The amount of pets wizs and tao can have already is high enough dont need anymore sub pets ��
UnKnownAngel
Leading Contributor
It's an arcamon, not a spell?
You was on about the arcamon summoning a shinsu or something aka another pet...?
zad48231
Leading Contributor
Why would it not be available to all classes?